Chains cover

Chains

Laurie Halse Anderson (2008)

A thirteen-year-old enslaved girl discovers that the Revolutionary War's promise of liberty was never meant for her.

EraContemporary Young Adult Historical Fiction
Pages316
Difficulty★★☆☆☆ Moderate
AP Appearances1

About Laurie Halse Anderson

Laurie Halse Anderson (b. 1961) is best known for Speak (1999), a novel about a teenage sexual assault survivor that became one of the most taught — and most banned — books in American schools. Anderson is drawn to stories about young people who are silenced by systems of power and who must find their voices in order to survive. She spent years researching the historical conditions of slavery in Revolutionary-era New York for Chains, working with primary sources, slave narratives, and the archives of the New-York Historical Society. The novel is the first in a trilogy (Chains, Forge, Ashes) that follows Isabel and Curzon through the American Revolution.

Life → Text Connections

How Laurie Halse Anderson's real experiences shaped specific elements of Chains.

Real Life

Anderson's career-long focus on silenced protagonists — from Melinda in Speak to Isabel in Chains

In the Text

Isabel's narration is defined by what she cannot say aloud. Her survival depends on silence, and her liberation requires voice.

Why It Matters

Anderson writes the same story across genres and centuries: a young person is silenced by power, and the act of speaking — or writing, or reading — is the first step toward freedom.

Real Life

Years of archival research into enslaved people's lives in Revolutionary New York — court records, runaway ads, church registries

In the Text

The novel's historical accuracy — street names, military events, legal codes, the demographics of enslaved New Yorkers

Why It Matters

The research makes the novel a corrective to the mythology of the American founding. Anderson writes history that textbooks omit.

Real Life

Anderson has spoken publicly about writing for young readers who are themselves experiencing powerlessness — in abusive homes, in unjust school systems

In the Text

Isabel's age and her position within an absolute power structure make her accessible to young readers who understand institutional helplessness

Why It Matters

The novel works as both historical fiction and contemporary allegory. Readers in systems they cannot control recognize Isabel immediately.

Real Life

Anderson structured Chains as the first of a trilogy, knowing Isabel's story could not be resolved in a single volume

In the Text

The novel ends on the water, in transit, without resolution — Isabel is free but not safe, liberated but not reunited with Ruth

Why It Matters

The open ending reflects historical reality. Escape from slavery was not a conclusion but a beginning — the start of a different kind of struggle.

Historical Era

1776 — American Revolution, British occupation of New York City

Declaration of Independence (July 1776) — proclaimed universal liberty while the authors owned enslaved peopleHickey Plot (June 1776) — conspiracy to assassinate George Washington, foiled by intelligence from multiple sourcesBattle of Brooklyn (August 1776) — British victory leading to the occupation of New YorkGreat Fire of New York (September 1776) — destroyed roughly a quarter of the city under mysterious circumstancesLord Dunmore's Proclamation (1775) — British offer of freedom to enslaved people who fled Patriot ownersWashington's crossing of the Delaware (December 1776) — the military counterpart to Isabel's personal crossing

How the Era Shapes the Book

The American Revolution provides the novel's central irony: a war fought for liberty by a nation that enslaved roughly twenty percent of its population. Anderson uses the historical setting not as backdrop but as argument. Every scene is structured around the gap between revolutionary rhetoric and revolutionary practice. The Declaration of Independence, the military campaigns, the political conspiracies — all exist in the novel simultaneously with branding irons, slave auctions, and family separations. Anderson insists that these are not separate histories but the same history, seen from different positions within the power structure.